🔗 Share this article

An activist organization has stated to have scraped a vast number of songs from Spotify and is getting ready to release them publicly.

Possible Boost for AI Development

Observers noted the seeming data breach could aid AI companies searching for material to develop their models.

An entity known as Anna’s Archive said it had scraped 86 million music files from Spotify and 256 million rows of associated data such as artist and record names. The company, which carries more than 100 million tracks, confirmed that the breach did not constitute its entire catalog.

“We have identified and disabled the malicious user accounts that engaged in illegal scraping,” stated a Spotify spokesperson.

The Swedish service, which has more than 700 million subscribers worldwide, added that an inquiry into unauthorised access identified a third party collected public metadata and used illicit tactics to circumvent DRM [digital rights management].

Archive's Stated Mission and Concerns

Spotify does not think the music acquired by Anna’s Archive has been released yet. Anna’s Archive, which is known for offering links to pirated books, said in a blog it wanted to create a ‘preservation archive’ for music.

The group claimed the audio files represented 99.6% of all music streamed to by Spotify users and would be shared via ‘peer-to-peer networks’, a means of exchanging large data files online.

“Of course the service doesn’t have all the music in the world, but it’s a great start,” said Anna’s Archive, which frames its purpose as “preserving humanity’s information and heritage”.

Model Development and Copyright Debate

A composer and campaigner for protecting artists’ copyright, said the leaked music would likely be used for developing AI models.

“Educating models on illegally sourced data is unfortunately common in the AI industry, so this accessed music is almost certain to be used instructing AI models,” he said.

The Anna’s Archive site makes references to LibGen, a vast online repository of copyrighted books that has allegedly been used by Meta to train its systems.

The co-founder of an AI startup wrote on the professional network that individuals of the public could in principle “create their own personal free equivalent of Spotify”. He added it could also allow tech companies to “train on contemporary music at scale”.

Intellectual property law has emerged as a battleground between creatives, authors and creatives on one side and AI companies on the other.

Policy Considerations and Reactions

Across Britain, creative professionals have protested against a government proposal to allow AI companies use copyright-protected work without consent unless the owner signals. Almost every respondent to a government consultation on the proposal has backed artists’ concerns.

The secretary of state for technology, research and technology told parliament this month there was “little consensus” on the issue, noting that ministers would “use the time to get this correct”. The administration has pledged to make policy proposals on AI and copyright by March 2025.